Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recensioni logical frame of his story almost to the present day with revelations that might eas- ily belong more to spy drama than recorded events.The volume is not perfect.For example, Bartali's essay about legitimated cover-ups tor terrorist incursions makes no mention of one of the most egregious examples of insider complicity with the Italian terrorists, that of Marco Donat Cattin, member of the group Prima Linea and son of Italian politician Carlo Donat Cattin, who was permitted to escape to France on the very day he was to be arrested and imprisoned.The academic world, where the student agitation initiated much breaking of silences, could have been dealt with in greater detail.And the Church, undergoing at that time some of its own inordinately revolutionary internal changes in the continuing aftermath of Vatican II, is, in this volume, generally relegated to the role of "bad guy", eager to maintain its traditional religious oppression.Similarly the influence of European and American pop culture, represented by the ubiquitous crooning of Julio Iglesias in that long ago summer in Florence, deserves some consideration as well, for it indubitably supported the transgressiveness of speaking out.On the whole, however, this is an outstanding volume and highly recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it