Effect of splanchnectomy on jejunal motility and Fos expression in brain stem after intestinal anaphylaxis in rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was to determine whether alterations in jejunal motility observed after antigen challenge of sensitized rats occurred after extirpation of the celiac-superior mesenteric ganglia. Hooded-Lister rats were prepared with an intact or extirpated celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion, an isolated Thiry-Vella loop of ileum for instillation of antigen, and jejunal electrodes for myoelectric recording. Animals were sensitized by injection of 10 microg egg albumin (EA, ip), and specific anti-EA IgE titers were determined to be >1:64. In both control and splanchnectomized rats, normal fasting migrating myoelectric complexes (MMC) were observed before challenge with EA. MMCs were disrupted, and diarrhea was observed immediately after EA challenge of control but not splanchnectomized animals. Brain stems were removed and processed for Fos immunoreactivity. The absence of perivascular neuropeptide Y immunoreactivity in the submucosa was used to confirm the success of splanchnectomy. The number of Fos-immunoreactive neuronal nuclei was significantly reduced in the brain stem after splanchnectomy. Thus the mesenteric sympathetic ganglia are an integral part of the extramural neuronal pathways required for altered motility in this model of intestinal anaphylaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".