MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2223182246

ANÁLISIS DE LOS MOTIVOS PARA PRACTICAR O NO ACTIVIDADES FÍSICAS EXTRACURRICULARES Y SU RELACIÓN CON EL AUTOCONCEPTO FÍSICO EN ESTUDIANTES CHILENOS

2016· article· es· W2223182246 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports and Physical Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPhysical activityQuarter (Canadian coin)Physical healthHumanitiesPsychotherapistPhysical therapyMedicineMental healthArtGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las relaciones entre la práctica de actividad física y autoconcepto han sido establecidas en diversos estudios. Los objetivos fueron: describir la práctica deportiva extracurricular y los motivos para realizarla o no; analizar las relaciones entre los motivos para practicar actividades físicas extracurriculares y las dimensiones del autoconcepto físico, y evaluar si esta práctica introducía diferencias en el autoconcepto físico. Participaron 1773 estudiantes chilenos. Se emplearon el CAF y un cuestionario sobre práctica deportiva y motivos elaborado ad hoc. Los resultados indicaron que la cuarta parte de los participantes no realizaba actividad física. Los motivos alegados eran la falta de tiempo y de ganas. Quienes sí practicaban lo hacían como fuente de salud, para estar en forma o por diversión. Los motivos para la práctica se relacionaban con todas las dimensiones del autoconcepto físico. El hecho de hacer actividades extracurriculares de tipo físico introdujo diferencias en las dimensiones del autoconcepto físico. The relationship between physical activity and self-concept have been established in several studies. The objectives were to describe extracurricular sports practice and the reasons for it or not; to analyze relationships between the reasons to practice extracurricular physical activities and dimensions of physical self, and to assess whether this practice introduced differences in physical self-concept. 1773 Chilean students participated. CAF were used and a questionnaire on sports practice and reasons developed ad hoc. The results indicated that a quarter of the participants did not perform physical activity. The reasons given were lack of time and lack of interest. Those who do practiced did so as a source of health, for fitness or for fun. The reasons for the practice were related to all dimensions of physical self-concept. The fact of doing physical extracurricular activities introduced differences in the dimensions of physical self-concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it