MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2223329423

지방소비세의 도입에 관한 연구

2004· article· ko· W2223329423 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
윤현석

Bibliographic record

Venue조세학술논집 · 2004
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Government Finance and Decentralization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTax reformValue-added taxAd valorem taxDirect taxConsumption taxIndirect taxEconomicsLocal governmentTax avoidanceState income taxPublic economicsBusinessEconomic policyPublic administrationPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To practice local decentralization and national balance development of new Government, the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs examine Consumption Tax to transfer a part of VAT to Local Tax. Nations which have high the financial independence of local Government impose mostly consumption tax as local tax. The nations are Japan, Germany, U.S.A, Canada. The local consumption tax system to introduce this nations can classify tax base separation system and tax base sharing system to tax base distribution. The former system is that central government and local government divide tax base and the specific government impose the specific tax base to have independent tax authority. U.S.A and some states of Canada adopt this system. The latter system determine tax authority to use jointly central government and local government. Japan, Germany and other states of Canada adopt this system. If we introduce the Local Consumption Tax, this systems examine merits and demerits and the system which improve the fiscal soundness of our local governments may find. Moreover the current tax law must improve provisions connected to introduction of the Local Consumption Tax.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue조세학술논집Same topicLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationFrench-language works237,207