MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2223392626

“The Awakening Has Come”: Canadian First Nations in the Great War Era, 1914-1932

2015· article· en· W2223392626 on OpenAlex
Eric Story

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian military history · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPoliticsLeagueGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceWorld War IISpanish Civil WarAgency (philosophy)Economic historyHistoryPolitical economyLawSociologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Great War era from 1914 to 1932, the historical literature has cast First Nations peoples as actors without agency, reacting primarily to government policy. This article will demonstrate that government policy had less of an impact on First Nations peoples than scholars have led readers to believe. At the outbreak of war in 1914, First Nations communities’ responses to the prospect of enlistment were varied. For those who did enlist, many were attempting to reconnect with the spirit of their ancestors. Once overseas, Indigenous soldiers found themselves in overwhelmingly anglicised environments. Despite these assimilative conditions, they practiced and sustained cultural and martial Indigenous tradition. When they returned home, First Nations veterans breathed new life into Indigenous political organisation. They created the League of Indians of Canada at the end of 1918, agitating for the well-being of First Nations peoples across the country. This article will argue that First Nations individuals and communities utilised the event of the Great War to further both personal and communal interests in a time of great uncertainty and assimilation. In a 1919 publication, Duncan Campbell Scott, the Canadian deputy superintendent of the Department of Indian Affairs, said, “ [T]he end of the [First World W]ar should mark the beginning of a new era for [First Nations] wherein they shall play an increasingly honourable and useful part in the history of a country that was once the free and © Canadian Military History 24, no. 2 (Summer/Autumn 2015): 11-35 1 : Canadian First Nations in the Great War Era, 1914-1932 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2015 1 2 : C a n a d ia n F i r s t N a t io n s in th e G r e a t W ar E r a open hunting ground of their forefathers.”1 To Scott, First Nations peoples had proven themselves during the Great War from 1914 to 1918.2 Over 4,000 of 35,000 Canadian First Nations eligible for military service served in the Canadian Expeditionary Force (ce f). In other words, at least 35 percent of the First Nations populationroughly equal to the percentage of Euro-Canadian war participantsserved during the Great War.3 Following the war, despite the new respect Scott claimed First Nations peoples deserved, government assimilatory policies continued.4 Even then, First Nations were able to form one of the first pan-Canadian Indigenous political organisations in the country’s history during the interwar period.5 Ontario veteran F.O. Loft (Mohawk) established the League of Indians of Canada at Sault Ste. Marie in September 1919, in order to give voice to First Nations peoples.6 Following the initiative of the league, provincial First Nations organisations began to form in the early 1930s.7 The historiography of Canadian First Nations soldiers and veterans in the Great War era is one that requires significant expansion. Beginning in 1985, scholars began to write about the “forgotten warriors” of the Great War and also drew attention, for the first 1 Duncan Campbell Scott, “Canadian Indians and the Great World War,” in Canada and the Great World War, vol. 3, Guarding the Channel Ports (Toronto: United Publishers of Canada, 1919), 328. 2 Legally “Indians” are considered one of three Aboriginal groups within Canada (the others being the Inuit and Metis). Although this paper focuses on the experiences of soldiers who were defined as “Indians” either by themselves or the Canadian government, it employs the term “First Nation” as a more widely accepted and culturally respectful label. 3 Timothy C. Winegard, For King and Kanata: Canadian Indians and the First World War (Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2012), 6. 4 See Lisa Salem-Wiseman, “ ‘Verily, the white man’s ways were the best’: Duncan Campbell Scott, Native Culture, and Assimilation,” Studies in Canadian Literature 21, no. 2 (1996), 120-142; Winegard, For King and Kanata, 28, 41-42 for assimilation policies. 5 Although the league is the first pan-Canadian organisation, the first inter­ provincial Indigenous political organisation was the General Council of Ontario and Quebec Indians. It was formed in 1870. 6 J.R. Miller, Skyscrapers Hide the Heavens: A History of Indian-White Relation in Canada, 3rd ed. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000), 318-319. 7 The one exception would be the Allied Tribes of British Columbia, whom formed in 19 15 . 2 Canadian Military History, Vol. 24 [2015], Iss. 2, Art. 2 http://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol24/iss2/2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it