MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2223627260 · doi:10.1353/ntc.2000.0012

Cultural Literacy, Cultural Practices, Cultural Studies, and the Curriculum in Foreign

2000· article· en· W2223627260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Young

Bibliographic record

VenueNuevo texto crítico/Nuevo texto crítico · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumForeign languageLiteracyCultural studiesPopularitySociologyProduct (mathematics)Cultural literacyAestheticsMedia studiesPedagogyPsychologySocial psychologyAnthropologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CULTURAL LITERACY, CULTURAL PRACTICES, CULTURAL STUDIES, AND THE CURRICULUM IN FOREIGN RICHARD YOUNG University ofAlberta Cultural studies, for good or ill, is everywhere. Its worldwide popularity marks out a deeper realignment in the constellation ofdisciplines and scholarly interests (Paul Gilroy) The impact ofcultural studies on the curriculum offoreign language and literature programs in North American universities during the last two decades or so is wide and varied and has been felt at the same time as cultural studies itselfhas taken shape and acquired a more commanding presence on the academic scene.1 Few foreign language and literature programs can have remained totally unaffected , although in many, perhaps most, the impact may well have been as much the product of accident as a design, a point I will explain in due course. It also seems safe to assume that were a survey taken on how the implications ofcultural studies have found their way into teaching and learning in foreign languages the results would show not only that no single paradigm stands out immediately as the one most frequently adopted, but that responses to cultural studies have been irregular and are more likely to have been dictated by local circumstances than by a universal model or what has transpired in disciplines at large. Having said as much, in the commentary that follows I am not about to propose a model or formula for the missing paradigm. Moreover, this paper is not the product ofany sounding of opinions or research into the status of language and literature programs in North American universities.2 Nor does it have any particular theoretical value, but has more the character ofruminations prompted by a particular Canadian context and the experience ofworking in programs in Spanish and LatinAmerican Studies in a department that, by styling itselfas a Department ofModern Languages and Cultural Studies, appears to combine the two pursuits in question in its activities. Even so, my comments on this experience might perhaps be read may more as a desideratum rather than an account of an actual state of affairs, or perhaps as a condition from which it is possible to extrapolate some conclusions about© 2000-2001 NUEVO TEXTO CRITICO Vol. XIII-XIV No. 25/28 256_______________________________________________RICHARD YOUNG the relation of foreign languages and literatures to cultural studies in general. Before discussing the circumstances ofthis particular case, however, it is appropriate first to establish the terrain on which the discussion might take place, to set its limits, and identify the issues at stake. What exactly does it mean to speak of cultural studies in relation to the study offoreign languages and literatures? Although a reply to this question might lead immediately to an analysis ofcultural studiesper se, its objectives, objects of study, and methods, I propose a different route. This is not to deny the importance of those whose work, whether in foreign languages or other disciplines, has led them to theorize cultural studies in relation to their teaching and research.3 Their work is all the more significant in light ofthe origins ofcultural studies itself in a predominantly English-speaking environment and the risk that it could be colonially applied to other language environments. For the purposes of this commentary , however, I wish initially to take cultural studies as a given in order to focus on its general impact in critical practice. Rather than critique perceived virtues or shortcomings, I wish to highlight the consequences of its existence and development in Academia. From this point ofview, foreign languages and literatures have felt the influence of cultural studies in two broad aspects: the contexts in which language and literature are studied and the objects of study. Reduced to its basics, cultural studies might be considered simplistically as the study of culture as a social phenomenon or product. Ifculture is a product, then "our knowledge of it," to borrow a comment from Henri Lefebvre about social space, "must be expected to reproduce and expound the process of production ."4 Seen from this perspective, cultural studies might be viewed as the study of how culture is formed within a social context, embracing notjust the processes of cultural production and transformation, but also how culture is consumed or practiced . Although it...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuevo texto crítico/Nuevo texto críticoSame topicSpanish Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207