MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2223676103

Detection and characterisation of groundwater discharge into lakes

2000· article· en· W2223676103 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Ray, P. B. Hostetler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterGeologySurface waterHydrology (agriculture)Dissolved silicaGroundwater dischargeTurbidityWater qualityEnvironmental scienceAquiferDissolutionGroundwater flowOceanographyChemistryEnvironmental engineeringEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aims of this study are. twofold. Our first aim is to locate groundwater discharge into lakes through mineralised Precambrian rock structures in the Canadian Shield. Groundwater is known to contribute to the water balance of lakes in the study area, but the exact location and volume of groundwater discharge is not well understood. Secondly, we aim to characterise this groundwater, both as regards its upgradient mineral content and subsequent chemical behaviour in the lake water. Detection of the groundwater was done close to the sediment-water interface using a water quality multiprobe to measure conductivity, pH, Eh, dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, temperature and depth. The presence of groundwater was deduced from in-situ DO and conductivity readings and subsequent chemical analysis of water samples for major cations and trace metals. A Differential GPS was used to record the location of the multiprobe to within 3 metres accuracy. Lake bottom depths were measured simultaneously. In general, bottom waters are oxygenated, even at depths greater than 100 metres. Dissolved silica concentrations in the photic zones of the lakes are comparable to those in surface ocean water (about 0.1 ppm), indicating the presence of diatoms. Inverse correlation between DO and silica concentrations - low DO and high silica - indicates groundwater discharge. Stagnant lake water with low DO is differentiated from groundwater on the basis of conductivity and dissolved silica, which are higher in groundwater. Groundwater emerging from eskers below the lake surface is differentiated from groundwater emerging from Precambrian rocks on the basis of higher dissolved calcium and sodium content in groundwater from eskers. About half of the bottom sites with low DO contain detectable H2S and have Eh levels close to the sulfide-sulfate boundary. Trace metals in the groundwater showed a variation in reactivity to both H2S and DO as they discharge into and mix with lake water. Dissolved iron concentration, for instance, varies inversely with DO, but is apparently unaffected by H2S. Dissolved copper is decreased to below 0.3 ppb by reaction with H2S, but is not effected by DO. Vanadium mobility is greatest under the most reducing conditions measured. These and other measurements indicate that trace metal reactions can be followed as the groundwater mixes with lake water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207