O początkach międzynarodowego ruchu romskiego (na 40-lecie Światowego Kongresu Romów – 1971)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forty years ago in April 1971 in Orpington around London, the First Romani Union \nCongress took place, with 23 representatives from 14 countries, including the author of this article. Currently the IRU unites 30 Roma organizations from Europe \nand 4 from overseas: Canada, The USA, Mexico and Israel. It is obvious that the \nRomani elite taking part in the movement are not the sole representatives of the various groups of Roma/Gypsies, Sinti, Gitanes, Manush, Travellers etc. Nevertheless, this is the strongest movement in Europe, which is even more important in times of growing aversion towards Roma citizens in the continent. For many years the 8th of April, when the Romani flag and anthem were proclaimed, has been the celebration day for all Romani groups in Europe, America, Australia and India.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".