MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2223808213

The Good Book: Reading Ishmael Reed’s Mumbo Jumbo as Neo-Hoodoo’s Sacred Text

2015· article· en· W2223808213 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reuben Copley

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œalbatross · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBricolageWhite (mutation)TricksterLiteratureReading (process)HistoryArtPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ishmael Reed’s Mumbo Jumbo uses a bricolage of techniques, forms, and styles to tell a tale of viral cultural and religious transmission: the story of Jes Grew. Mumbo Jumbo is a trickster that textually transmutes information (some true and some false) into a sacred text detailing the influences and history of the Neo-Hoodoo.1 The text incorporates a large number of influences from a diverse array of artistic and intellectual sources to make a case for an alternative understanding of the cultural history of the world that challenges the mountebank constructions of the White man: the “White man will never admit his real references. He will steal everything you have and still call you those names. He will drag

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œalbatrossSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207