OTİSTİK ÇOCUK EBEVEYNLERİNİN GENİŞ OTİZM FENOTİPİ VE ALEKSİTİMİ ÖZELLİKLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autism is a developmental disorder as a result of the interaction of many individual genes and is a characterized by the lack of social and communicative behavior, limitations in activities and interests. Based on the structure of the genetic basis of autism, it might be considered that families of the autistic individuals may differ from the normal population. In the general population, some milder autistic symptoms were seen at the parents of children with autism like; social and cognitive deficits, communication skills differences, repetitive behaviors, narrow interests, identity needs and tendency to focus on details. These milder behaviours are called Broad Autism Phenotype.Emotions is one of the area where the children with autism have problems. Alexithymic people is another group that are experiencing difficulty in recognizing and expressing their feelings. This study is aimed to determine the relationship between the Broad Autism Phenotype and Alexithymia properties of the parents of autistic individuals. The study is prepared in accordance with the model of relational research with 494 parents.In the study; Parental Information Form, in order to assess broader autism phenotype characteristics, Autism Spectrum Quotient and in order to assess the alexithymic properties, Toronto Alexithymia Scale were used. Finally, there is a significant relationship between Toronto Alexithymia Scale total test score and Autism Spectrum Quotient Social skills, Attention Switching, Communication, Imagination subscale scores of mothers of autistic individuals and Attention Switching, Communication, Imagination subscale scores and Autism Spectrum Quotient total score of fathers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".