MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Traffic Noise on Housing Values

2015· article· en· W2224346108 on OpenAlexaff
Esra Ozdenerol, Ying Huang, Farid Javadnejad, Anzhelika Antipova

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Real Estate Practice and Education · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuisanceTraffic noiseNoise (video)MemphisRoadway noiseProperty valueNoise pollutionTransport engineeringEconometricsBusinessComputer scienceEconomicsEngineeringFinancePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the impact of traffic noise and how it is systematically capitalized into the house value discount. By using the speed and volume values of traffic flows as inputs to the noise prediction model, we created noise nuisance rings using a geographic information system (GIS) for the entire road and rail road transportation system in Shelby County, Tennessee. We found that traffic nuisance, in general, has a significantly negative impact on housing values. The discount on housing values increases in the noise nuisance levels. In addition, the increased intensity of traffic volume within the Memphis Aerotropolis boundary leads to a further decrease in housing values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Real Estate Practice and EducationSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207