Identification of brain regions of interest for epilepsy surgery planning using support vector machines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In patients with intractable epilepsy, surgical resection is a promising treatment; however, post surgical seizure freedom is contingent upon accurate identification of the seizure onset zone (SOZ). Identification of the SOZ in extratemporal epilepsy requires invasive intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings as well as resource intensive and subjective analysis by epileptologists. Expert inspection yields inconsistent localization of the SOZ which leads to comparatively poor post surgical outcomes for patients. This study employs recordings from 6 patients undergoing resection surgery in order to develop an automated and scalable system for identifying regions of interest (ROIs). Leveraging machine learning techniques and features used for seizure detection, a classification system was trained and tested on patients with Engel class I to class IV outcomes, demonstrating superior performance in the class I patients. Further, classification using features based upon both high frequency and low frequency oscillations was best able to identify channels suited for resection. This study demonstrates a novel approach to ROI identification and provides a path for developing tools to improve outcomes in epilepsy surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".