MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2224394739 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2044-2_34

The Cl 7 Approach to the Standard Model

2004· book-chapter· en· W2224394739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBirkhäuser Boston eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinorPhysicsHiggs bosonStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Clifford algebraTheoretical physicsFermionHiggs fieldCharge (physics)Mathematical physicsHomogeneous spaceParticle physicsGauge (firearms)Algebra over a fieldMathematicsPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent geometric approach to the standard model in terms of the Clifford algebra Cl 7 is summarized. The complete gauge group of the standard model is shown to arise naturally and uniquely by considering all rotations in seven-dimensional space that (1) conserve the spacetime components of the particle and antiparticle currents and (2) do not couple the right-chiral neutrino. The spinor mediates a physical coupling of Poincaré and isotopic symmetries within the restrictions of the Coleman-Mandula theorem. The four extra spacelike dimensions in the model form a basis for the Higgs isodoublet field. The charge assignments of both the fundamental fermions and the Higgs boson are produced exactly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it