MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2224476144 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2005-0002

CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR PNEUMATIC SYSTEM WITH CONNECTION PORT RESTRICTION: AN LMI APPROACH

2005· article· en· W2224476144 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pascal Bigras

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)SingularityPneumatic cylinderFeedback linearizationServomechanismNonlinear systemConnection (principal bundle)LinearizationLinear matrix inequalityMathematicsComputer scienceControl engineeringCylinderEngineeringControl (management)Mathematical optimizationPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach to designing a nonlinear pressure controller for a pneumatic cylinder system for which the connection port comprises a non negligible restriction. The pressure chamber of this system is difficult to control because the servo valve and the connection port form a double restriction. This double restriction causes a singularity in the feedback linearization controller. To avoid this singularity, a modified feedback linearization controller is proposed. The Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) approach is then used to calculate the controller gains which ensure the exponential stability of the tracking error and the non-singularity of the control law. Simulation results show the good performance of the proposed controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207