MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2224661124

L'industrie du bois à l'emplacement actuel des secteurs Hull et Gatineau de la ville de Gatineau (1800-1920)

2007· article· fr· W2224661124 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julien Marcadet

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesForestryPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce mémoire traite de l'industrie du bois dans la vallée de l'Outaouais, une région du Canada entre 1800 et 1920. Cette vallée est coupée en deux par un très grand axe navigable, la rivière des Outaouais, qui est la frontière entre le Canada francophone et le Canada anglophone, depuis l'arrivée de colons de langue anglaise. Sur la rive nord, on retrouve désormais la ville de Gatineau, troisième pôle démographique du Québec. Sur la rive sud, Ottawa, capitale du Canada. Jamais la vallée de l'Outaouais n'a été envisagée comme unie, la rivière jouant toujours le rôle de délimitation. Je vais donc m'intéresser à ce qui a constitué une grande partie de l'histoire de la région, l'industrie du bois, et plus particulièrement celle qui se retrouvait à l'emplacement actuel des secteurs Hull et Gatineau de la ville de Gatineau, sous différents aspects : développement, production, technique. Et cela toujours dans une perspective oppositive et comparative avec l'industrie du bois sur la rive sud et d'inscription dans un contexte régional, national et international.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicAgriculture and Rural Development Research→French-language works237,207→