Власть и Население в Российской Провинции: Опыт Сотрудничества в Губернских Органах Управления и Суда (Последняя Четверть Xviii в) (Administration and Population in the Russian Province: Cooperation of Regional Administration and Legislation (Last Quarter of XVIII C))
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Russian Abstract: В статье рассматривается реформирование системы местных государственных учреждений в России 1775-1785 гг., подчеркивается, что оно опиралось на традиции общественного управления. Асинхронность развития областей Российской империи, неравноценность демографических ресурсов для проведения сословных выборов, социальной среды для осуществления правосудия определяли различные результаты в деятельности судебных представителей. English Abstract: The article explores the reforms in the system of local state institutions of Russia between 1775 and 1785 based on tradition of public administration. The asynchrony of the Russian Empire's regional development, the lack of demographic resources for estate-based elections, or lack of social environment for carrying out the justice served as impact for differentiated results in legal activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".