MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2224825792 · doi:10.24102/ijes.v4i3.563

Local Climate Trends and Farmers’ Perceptions in Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

2015· article· en· W2224825792 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Misgina Gebrehiwot Abrha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environment and Sustainability · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographySocioeconomicsAgroforestryClimate changeWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to investigate changes in local climate, farmers’ perception to the change and factors affecting perception of farmers to climate change. For trend analysis, we gathered station based rainfall records for the period 1978-2012, while for perception analysis survey was carried out. 600 farming households were randomly selected from four districts using a multi-stage sampling method. Nonparametric analyses were used for analyzing trends and testing significance. Farming households were asked their observation about changes in local climate using structured questionnaires. We also utilized logistics regression to identify factors that influenced perceptions of farming households on climate change. Results indicate that while annual rainfall showed no change across the region, Kiremt and Belg rainfalls exhibited significant increasing and decreasing trends in the last three decades respectively. The study confirmed that the change in rainfall trend varies by agro-ecology. Kiremt rainfall in the lowlands increased by about 106mm/decade; yet, highlands got non-significant change. Besides, when the highlands lost significant amount of Belg rainfall (35mm/d), lowlands didn’t show any significant reduction. As to perception, about 87% and 50% of respondents perceived Belg and Kiremt rainfall decreasing respectively where their observation was more or less consistent with statistical findings. This study learned that gender, education, farm experience, extension, climate information, economic status, drought experience and local agro-ecology positively influenced farmers’ perception. Yet, irrigation negatively affected farmers’ perception. Results suggest further works in the areas of information dissemination, inclusion of local knowledge in adaptation programs and irrigation developments to reduce impacts. Key words : seasonal rainfall , climate change, farmers’ perceptions, perception determinants, Northern Ethiopia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environment and SustainabilitySame topicClimate change impacts on agricultureFrench-language works237,207