MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2225221798 · doi:10.7699/j.ynnu.ns-2015-003

Fluid Flow Situation in the Nozzle of the Theoretical Analysis and Numerical Simulation

2015· article· en· W2225221798 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaofang Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleCorrectnessMach numberComputer simulationFlow (mathematics)MechanicsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the flow of the fluid in the nozzle status were analyzed in detail. The results indicated that the changing rule of the nozzle cross section not only depends on the change situation of the velocity of flow, but also related to other state parameters, especially the Mach number. Finally, the correctness of the simulation and the feasibility of numerical simulation in practical engineering were proved by comparing the simulation of laval nozzle with the theoretical analysis of it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University)Same topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207