MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2225755485 · doi:10.7202/1034097ar

Changements de l’occupation du sol dans la plaine inondable du lac Saint-Pierre entre les années 1950 et 1997

2015· article· fr· W2225755485 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Diane Dauphin, Benoı̂t Jobin

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsGDG EnvironnementCanarie
FundersEnvironment Canada
KeywordsForestryGeographyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le lac Saint-Pierre est le site d’une biodiversité exceptionnelle. Toutefois, les activités anthropiques ont mené à la perte et à la dégradation des milieux naturels au cours des dernières décennies si bien que de nombreuses espèces fauniques, dont la perchaude (Perca flavescens), montrent des déclins marqués de leur population. La perte d’habitats de reproduction serait l’un des facteurs déterminants pour expliquer cette situation. Afin de documenter les changements d’occupation du sol survenus au niveau de la plaine inondable du lac Saint-Pierre, des photos aériennes prises à 3 périodes (1950, 1964 et 1997) ont été interprétées et comparées. Il en ressort qu’environ 3 200 ha d’habitats fauniques (milieux naturels + cultures pérennes) ont été modifiés dans la zone de récurrence d’inondation de 0-2 ans. Le changement le plus important concerne la conversion de quelque 2 500 ha de cultures pérennes (fourrages, pâturages) en cultures annuelles (maïs, soya) peu propices à la faune. Des habitats naturels ont également été modifiés, en particulier 350 ha de prairies humides. Outre la perchaude, d’autres groupes fauniques sont affectés par ces changements d’occupation du sol, notamment les passereaux et les canards barboteurs qui nichent dans les cultures pérennes et les prairies. La restauration d’habitats et le changement des pratiques agricoles font partie des actions qui peuvent être mises de l’avant pour favoriser le rétablissement des espèces en difficulté au lac Saint-Pierre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207