← Back to cohort
An Examination of the Existing Measures of Cultural Difference: Does One Size Fit All?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueKent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHEC MontréalUniversität MannheimUniversidade do PortoUniwersytet WarszawskiUniversità di PisaSyddansk UniversitetOulun YliopistoLinnéuniversitetetUniversité de FribourgTrường Đại học Kinh tế - Luật, Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí MinhUniwersytet ŁódzkiMittuniversitetetUniversità degli Studi di PaviaTampereen YliopistoKungliga Tekniska HögskolanHebrew University of JerusalemLunds UniversitetUniversidad Complutense de MadridKyung Hee UniversityRWTH Aachen UniversityRadboud UniversiteitUniversiteit van AmsterdamUniversity of CanberraNational Taiwan UniversityGriffith UniversityUniversity of New South WalesLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceCranfield UniversityUniversidade de PernambucoUniversity of GlasgowMiddlesex UniversityEuropean CommissionAston UniversityKing's College LondonUniversidade de São PauloDurham UniversityUniversidad Europea de MadridUniversidade de VigoUniversity of SussexCopenhagen Business SchoolUniwersytet SzczecińskiUniversidade Federal de PernambucoUniversität SiegenRijksuniversiteit GroningenAberystwyth UniversityUniversidade do Vale do ItajaíUniversidade de Santa Cruz do SulUniversity of Central PunjabLa Trobe UniversityMeiji UniversityUniversity of CyprusUniversity of NottinghamUniversidad de AlicanteUniversity of HullKingston UniversityUniversität BremenUniversity of EssexUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulTrent UniversityQueen Mary University of LondonLondon South Bank UniversityUniversity of PatrasCyprus University of TechnologyAthens University of Economics and BusinessUniversity of DelhiUniversity of TsukubaUniversità di CataniaItä-Suomen YliopistoTexas Christian UniversityEuropean Investment BankMacquarie UniversityTartu ÜlikoolUppsala UniversitetLappeenranta University of TechnologyAalto-YliopistoNottingham Trent UniversityUniversitat de ValènciaManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of LeedsAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandNihon UniversityHögskolan KristianstadBournemouth UniversityBudapesti Corvinus EgyetemOsaka University of EconomicsUniversidade de AveiroPhilipps-Universität MarburgUniversity of ReadingEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichHankuk University of Foreign StudiesUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaFlorida International UniversityUniversiteit van TilburgTurun YliopistoKeio UniversityNational Geographic Society
KeywordsStatisticsMathematics
DOInot available
Abstract
Effects of competitive advantages on export behavior: a case of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.461
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes