MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2226420821 · doi:10.4000/books.ifea.7133

Cuando los diablos moran y abandonan las minas

2013· book-chapter· es· W2226420821 on OpenAlexaff
Carmen Salazar-Soler

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut français d’études andines eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPersonaPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hace ya algunos años realizamos un estudio en un centro minero del departamento de Huancavelica. En ese trabajo de investigación sacamos a la luz una serie de creencias y prácticas religiosas que giraban en torno a una fuerza representada por el Muqui, una fuerza de dimensiones acentuadamente diabólicas con quien los mineros sellaban pactos por los cuales se ofrecía la vida de una persona a cambio de riquezas. Quedaba pendiente analizar la evolución de esta creencia en el tiempo y comprobar ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitut français d’études andines eBooksSame topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207