OS PERCURSOS DA MEMÓRIA: a exposição virtual cartes postales du Québec d'antan como fonte de informação histórica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a virtual reading trip through the exposition Cartes postales du Québec d’antan, which \nis part of the bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Based on the work Le Pays et \nla mémoire: pratiques et représentations de l’espace français chez Gilles Corrozet et Charles Estienne, \nde Chantal Liaroutzos, we conduct a research about the vulgarization and popularization of the \nhistorical knowledge in digital means. Our approach aims to get the study about a poetics of the space \nconducted by Liaroutzos, based on popular texts of the XVI century France, through a contemporary \nreading, carried out in electronic means, involving memory, patrimony, education and sources of \nhistorical information. It is an attempt to bring the history told in books, the ones from traditional \ncollections in libraries, closer to the one presented in virtual means, especially concerning the didactic \naspect of the teaching of History and the appropriations of what can be read on the Internet and the \ninformation sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".