Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Rapid Eye Movement Dependent and Other Types of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Some cognitive functions have shown to be impaired in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS); however, differences between substypes have not been investigated yet. We aim to compare patients with rapid eye movement (REM) dependent sleep apnea syndrome (ROSAS) and control OSAS (COSAS) with regard to the impairment in cognitive functions and several sleep parameters. Methods: Fifty COSAS and 20 ROSAS patients who met the inclusion criteria and diagnosed via polysomnographic examination were assessed using a data collection form and several scales. Results and conclusion: No significant statistical difference was detected between groups regarding cognitive functions. The findings indicate that the cognitive function impairments in OSAS do not get more significant with the intensifying of the abnormal respiratory functions in REM periods. J Neurol Res. 2015;5(6):283-290 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jnr363w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".