Des innovations sociales par et pour les personnes en situation de handicap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les reseaux militants, crees et portes par les personnes en situation de handicap, sont tres mal connus du grand public, tout comme des professionnels du sanitaire et du social en France. Pour la plupart, issus d'horizons internationaux, ces reseaux ont developpe des experimentations originales qui questionnent le projet inclusif de notre societe et apportent des elements constructifs au debat citoyen sur l'accompagnement des personnes en situation de handicap, bien au-dela de nos usuels horizons de pensee. Qu'elles proviennent du Bangladesh, du Canada, des Etats-Unis, de la Grande-Bretagne, de la Hongrie, de la Suede ou bien de la France, les innovations sociales presentees ici portent en elles de nouvelles conceptions de la sante, du handicap ou de la maladie, et, enfin, montrent les chemins permettant le developpement de potentiels insoupconnes. Ces innovations sociales dessinent le paysage d'un autre vivre ensemble et mettent en lumiere la possibilite d'une autre politique publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".