MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

What to Do With Unavoidable Dead Ends

2007· article· en· W2227173888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amie Hanson, Gregg Kirmeyer, Peter Lee Gilmore, Scott Banack, Chris Huston

Bibliographic record

VenueOpflow · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMains electricityDead endFoundation (evidence)EngineeringTurbidityCivil engineeringEnvironmental planningOperations managementEnvironmental sciencePolitical scienceLawEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses Calgary Water Services' (CWS) participation in the Awwa Research Foundation project, Development of Distribution System Water Quality Optimization Plans, in 2003. A study team sponsored by CWS found that the utility currently has no problems with low chlorine residual, high turbidity, or microorganisms control. However, dead‐end mains continue to be added to the distribution system due to new construction of cul‐de‐sacs in new suburban neighborhoods. The article discusses several recommendations made by the team to assist CWS in meeting industry BMPs for dead‐end mains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0110.028
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpflowSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207