MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2227287762 · doi:10.2514/1.g001041

Approximation of Infinitesimal Rotations in Calculus of Variations

2016· article· en· W2227287762 on OpenAlexafffund
Soroosh Hassanpour, G. R. Heppler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInfinitesimalMathematicsRotation matrixInfinitesimal transformationRotation (mathematics)Angular velocityAngular accelerationVector calculusCalculus (dental)AccelerationMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsClassical mechanicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on problems dealing with very small angular displacements, i.e., infinitesimal or micro rotations, where these rotations are desired to be approximately treated as Euclidean vectors. For such problems, an appropriate and consistent approach to approximate the rotation matrix, the angular velocity and acceleration vectors, and the virtual rotation vector, up to the first order, is presented and the calculus of variations (or Hamilton’s principle) when applied to such problems is characterized. Also, a discrepancy observed in previous works dealing with the infinitesimal rotations, where second- or higher-order approximations have been employed, is reviewed. The consistent and comprehensive approach for the first-order approximation of infinitesimal rotations, presented in this paper, is employed to derive the dynamic equations of a symmetric spinning top and a gyroelastic continuum and is proved to result in the correct and complete dynamic equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsSame topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207