MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2227287762 · doi:10.2514/1.g001041

Approximation of Infinitesimal Rotations in Calculus of Variations

2016· article· en· W2227287762 on OpenAlexafffund
Soroosh Hassanpour, G. R. Heppler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInfinitesimalMathematicsRotation matrixInfinitesimal transformationRotation (mathematics)Angular velocityAngular accelerationVector calculusCalculus (dental)AccelerationMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsClassical mechanicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on problems dealing with very small angular displacements, i.e., infinitesimal or micro rotations, where these rotations are desired to be approximately treated as Euclidean vectors. For such problems, an appropriate and consistent approach to approximate the rotation matrix, the angular velocity and acceleration vectors, and the virtual rotation vector, up to the first order, is presented and the calculus of variations (or Hamilton’s principle) when applied to such problems is characterized. Also, a discrepancy observed in previous works dealing with the infinitesimal rotations, where second- or higher-order approximations have been employed, is reviewed. The consistent and comprehensive approach for the first-order approximation of infinitesimal rotations, presented in this paper, is employed to derive the dynamic equations of a symmetric spinning top and a gyroelastic continuum and is proved to result in the correct and complete dynamic equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsSame topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207