MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2227358074 · doi:10.5753/cbie.wcbie.2015.1290

Experiência no Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação à Docência (PIBID): Desenvolvimento do Raciocínio Lógico e Algoritmo na Educação Básica

2015· article· pt· W2227358074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais ... Workshops do Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Bureau for International Education
KeywordsScholarshipHumanitiesBar (unit)Computer scienceSubject (documents)Political scienceLibrary sciencePhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to present the knowledge and improvement acquired in teaching through the PIBIDs project (Institutional Program of Teaching Initiations Scholarship) that through a course to teach the constructions of algorithms, logic and the algorithm itself. This job was done at E.E.E.F.M. Barão de Igarapé Miri School in Belém. It was tried to achieve a great performance and understanding from the students about the subject that was taught, practicing the knowledge learned through the pseudo-language Portugol and exercises related with the their daily, aiming to improve the way the subjects were taught.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it