MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2228007713 · doi:10.26522/tl.v2i2.75

You Should Publish That! A Primer On Educational Publishing

2005· article· en· W2228007713 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching and Learning · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Education and E-Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicationClass (philosophy)Primer (cosmetics)Set (abstract data type)PublishingMathematics educationCurriculumComputer scienceLibrary sciencePsychologyPedagogyPolitical scienceChemistryProgramming languageLawArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Have you ever used a textbook with your class and thought, "I could write something more interesting than this?" Perhaps you have developed a set of activities to support a strand of the curriculum and your colleagues say, "You should get that published!" Or you may have written a practical guide as part of an additional qualification or graduate course and realized it would be useful to other teachers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0190.021
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1480.190

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching and LearningSame topicOpen Education and E-LearningFrench-language works237,207