MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2228018601 · doi:10.4000/rh19.4884

John Stuart Mill et Harriet Taylor. Écrits sur l’égalité des sexes, textes traduits et présentés par Françoise Orazi

2015· article· fr· W2228018601 on OpenAlexaff
Valentine Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire du XIXe siècle · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsECW Press (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtMillPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C’est une anthologie fort utile que propose Françoise Orazi. John Stuart Mill est l’un des premiers philosophes anglo-saxons à avoir défendu la cause des femmes avec conviction, inspiré par le regard critique que portait sa compagne Harriet Taylor sur la condition féminine dans l’Angleterre victorienne. Aussi l’anthologie repose-t-elle sur la mise en évidence de ce que l’éditrice nomme la « double auteurité » des écrits milliens sur l’égalité des sexes. Ce choix s’inscrit dans la lignée des t...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire du XIXe siècleSame topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207