A Parabolic Flight Study of the Mobile Information System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Focus on sustained lunar operations and human exploration of Mars has become the National Aeronautical Space Administration 's (NASA) goal for the 21<sup>st</sup> century. NASA's objective is to provide crewmembers with a “hands-free” environment to promote more efficient operations in microgravity and reduced planetary gravity missions. A prototype integrated Mobile Information SysTem (MlST) was evaluated in a simulated microgravity environment while supporting the Langley Research Center (LaRC) Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF<sup>3</sup>) experiment. Two LaRC crewmembers wore the MIST during half of the parabolic flights as the experimental group. The other half of the parabolic flights served as a baseline group without the MIST being worn. Post-flight questionnaires, interviews, video/audio analysis, and field observations were used as evaluation measures. Results indicate mobility and compactness of a display are important in experimental procedures and other tasks. Using the MIST facilitated team communications and dynamics capturing more information about the experiment under these flight conditions.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".