A Parabolic Flight Study of the Mobile Information System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focus on sustained lunar operations and human exploration of Mars has become the National Aeronautical Space Administration 's (NASA) goal for the 21st century. NASA's objective is to provide crewmembers with a “hands-free” environment to promote more efficient operations in microgravity and reduced planetary gravity missions. A prototype integrated Mobile Information SysTem (MlST) was evaluated in a simulated microgravity environment while supporting the Langley Research Center (LaRC) Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3) experiment. Two LaRC crewmembers wore the MIST during half of the parabolic flights as the experimental group. The other half of the parabolic flights served as a baseline group without the MIST being worn. Post-flight questionnaires, interviews, video/audio analysis, and field observations were used as evaluation measures. Results indicate mobility and compactness of a display are important in experimental procedures and other tasks. Using the MIST facilitated team communications and dynamics capturing more information about the experiment under these flight conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".