MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2228495421 · doi:10.1002/jcc.24286

Combining classical molecular dynamics and quantum mechanical methods for the description of electronic excitations: The case of carotenoids

2016· article· en· W2228495421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Research CouncilInstitute of Infection and ImmunityConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsPhotoprotectionQuantumDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Molecular dynamicsSinglet stateExcited stateDynamics (music)CarotenoidStatistical physicsPhysicsChemistryChemical physicsBiological systemClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carotenoids are important actors both in light-harvesting (LH) and in photoprotection functions of photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes. A deep theoretical investigation of this multiple role is still missing owing to the difficulty of describing the delicate interplay between electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom. A possible strategy is to combine accurate quantum mechanical (QM) methods with classical molecular dynamics. To do this, however, accurate force-fields (FF) are necessary. This article presents a new FF for the different carotenoids present in LH complexes of plants. The results show that all the important structural properties described by the new FF are in very good agreement with QM reference values. This increased accuracy in the simulation of the structural fluctuations is also reflected in the description of excited states. Both the energy order and the different nature of the lowest singlet states are preserved during the dynamics when the new FF is used, whereas an unphysical mixing is found when a standard FF is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it