MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2228546567 · doi:10.5555/2874916.2874939

An optimization model for assessing multi-products productions from biomass: a case of renewable Malaysian oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB)

2015· article· en· W2228546567 on OpenAlexaff
Abdul Halim, Abdul Halim Abdul Razik, Mohamed Elsholkami, Ali Elkamel, Leonardo C. Simon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfitability indexRenewable energyRaw materialContext (archaeology)Biomass (ecology)Supply chainPalm oilInvestment (military)BusinessRenewable resourceEnvironmental economicsProduction (economics)Agricultural engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental scienceEngineeringEconomicsAgricultural science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The economic potentials of Malaysian oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) are realized with its abundance resources in the country and the feasibility of this renewable feedstock to produce multi-products ranging from energy, chemicals and materials. Amid continuing supports from the government in terms of policies, strategies and funding, manufacturing planning in enterprising EFB's potential are still requiring a fundamental tool for decision making process. Biomass supply chain model in this context can present economic indications for maximizing profitability or/and minimizing investment risks. This paper has outlined important steps and developed biomass supply chain model of EFB for multi-products productions. Options are available in the model's superstructure to produce bio-products with high profitability as well as considerations for other economic decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversion→French-language works237,207→