Cooperación y Asistencia Judicial con la Corte Penal Internacional: el Caso de Ecuador (Cooperation and Judicial Assistance with the International Criminal Court: A Case-Study of Ecuador)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spanish Abstract: Este ensayo es parte de una publicacion conjunta que analiza los desafios en America Latina, Espana, Alemania e Italia para implementar mecanismos de cooperacion y asistencia a la Corte Penal Internacional. El ensayo se centra en las reformas que se deben contemplar en el Codigo de Procedimiento Penal de Ecuador, con el fin de poder cumplir con las disposiciones establecidas en el Parte IX del Estatuto de Roma. English Abstract: This essay is part of a publication that analyzes the challenges to implement internal mechanisms to cooperate and assist the International Criminal Court in Latin America, Spain, Germany and Italy. The essay focuses on the reforms needed in the Criminal Procedural Code of Ecuador in order to fully implement cooperation dispositions in Part IX of the Rome Statute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it