MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2228691095

Examining UCH-L1 In Mouse Spermatogonia

2013· article· en· W2228691095 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chelsea Jade Schuster

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTUNEL assayBiologyPopulationApoptosisCell cultureGerm cellCell growthStem cellAndrologyViability assayCellCell biologyMolecular biologyBiochemistryGeneticsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) form the foundation of fertility throughout the life of the adult male. However, pathways controlling their self-renewal versus differentiation remain poorly understood. It has previously been established that the deubiquinating enzyme Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase 1 (UCH-L1) is specifically expressed in undifferentiated spermatogonia that contain the SSC population [1]. Based on previous observations that UCH-L1 expression decreases with germ-line differentiation, it is hypothesized that UCH-L1 may play a role in SSC maintenance. The overall goal of the project is to elucidate the role of UCH-L1 in an immortalized type A spermatogonia mouse cell line. METHODS: This project uses C18-4 cells [2], an immortalized type A mouse spermatogonia cell line, treated with a specific, reversible, active site directed inhibitor of UCH-L1 to examine the growth characteristics of germ cells in the absence of UCH-L1 activity. Cells were treated with 5µM, 10µM and 20µM of UCH-L1 inhibitor compared to DMSO (vehicle) and no treatment control for 24 and 48 hours. Changes in cell number, viability, proliferation (EdU), and apoptosis (TUNEL) were assessed between treatments. RESULTS: A decreasing trend of cell number and proliferation was observed with increasing UCH-L1 inhibitor concentration. The greatest change in cell number was observed in the 48-hour treatment group with 20µM of UCH-L1 inhibitor (p=0.0659) (Figure 1). There was no change observed in TUNEL or cell viability. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results analyzed to date show no significant differences between treatments, which is likely due to low replicate number (n=2).  However, a trend of decreasing cell number and proliferation was observed with increasing UCH-L1 inhibitor concentration for both 24 hour and 48-hour treatments.  Results of these experiments will help determine the appropriate inhibitor treatment to further examine the mechanistic actions of UCH-L1. Furthermore, elucidating this pathway may lead to new strategies to support expansion of SSCs in vitro .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta→Same topicSperm and Testicular Function→French-language works237,207→