MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2228872546 · doi:10.1093/wjaf/15.1.38

Technical Note: White Pine Blister Rust, Root Disease, and Bears

2000· article· en· W2228872546 on OpenAlexaff
R. S. Hunt

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Journal of Applied Forestry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRibesRust (programming language)BiologyHorticultureWhite (mutation)BotanyForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prior to harvest, nine root disease sites lacked any Ribes spp., but after harvest six supported Ribes spp. Surveys indicated that Ribes spp. and other berry plants were in greater abundance in root disease areas than in adjacently harvested areas. Seed deposition by bears and periodic flourishing in root disease areas are likely contributors to forest seed banks. On one site the blister rust incidence in white pines was 98% in the root disease area and 27% in the adjacent nonroot diseased area. The presence of root disease should be used to rank an area for high hazard potential to blister rust. West. J. Appl. For. 15(1)38-39.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern Journal of Applied ForestrySame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207