MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2228965604 · doi:10.31289/perspektif.v5i1.172

ANALISIS KINERJA BADAN PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA DAERAH KABUPATEN KARO DALAM UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA ERUPSI GUNUNG SINABUNG DI KABUPATEN KARO

2016· article· en· W2228965604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePERSPEKTIF · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication Studies and Media
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMountAgency (philosophy)Management strategyQualitative researchBusinessSociologySocial scienceBusiness administrationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intent and purpose of this study was to determine how the performance of the Regional Disaster Management Agency in the Karo District Disaster Relief Efforts eruption of Mount Sinabung, to know what obstacles faced by the Regional Disaster Management Agency in the Karo District Disaster Relief Efforts eruption of Mount Sinabung. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative method, which uses the theory of an explanatory research with a view to interpreting the phenomena occurring in the performance of Regional Disaster Management Agency Karo in Efforts for Disaster Management eruption of Mount Sinabung and done by involving a variety of data collection techniques exist. Produce and process the data descriptive nature, such as interviews and direct observation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it