MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229000347

Experiences of female students completing a full-time Aboriginal program by computer-mediated communication

2001· article· en· W2229000347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical educationComputer sciencePsychologyMultimediaMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This naturalistic inquiry examines the experiences of female Aboriginal students who
\nwere completing a full-time college program by computer-mediated communication (CMC).
\nThe college program was designed for the preparation of Aboriginal Teacher Assistants. The
\nbackground literature examines the work of previous scholars on listening to women?s
\nvoices, connected learning, appropriate technology for Aboriginal learners and the use of
\ncomputer-mediated communication in meeting learners? needs. Eight students volunteered to
\nparticipate in the study. Two were lost through attrition.
\nData were collected through two sets of face-to-face interviews, one set of
\ntelephone interviews, field notes and observation of online messages posted by the
\nparticipants. Participant profiles were created from the participants? own words, and the data
\nwere analysed for emergent themes. Three themes were identified. These included
\ndemographics, prior educational experiences and learning preferences.
\nThe analyses of the interrelationships resulted in the identification of barriers to
\npositive post secondary educational learning experiences and to the participants? concepts of
\nthemselves as learners. The participants? experiences in the Aboriginal Teacher Assistant
\nProgram were then examined in relationship to these barriers.
\nThe participants? successfully completed this full-time college program and reported
\npositive experiences in doing so. Through the analyses of their experiences, factors that led
\nto the participants? success were identified. It was determined that for these women to be
\nsuccessful, not only must education must be community-based, flexible, and holistic but also
\nfoster and nurture relationships between and among students and instructor. These factors
\nwere supported by the CMC method o f delivery.
\nImplications include providing (1) appropriate technologies, (2) multiple ways of
\nconnecting and interacting and (3) face-to-face components when delivering Aboriginal
\nprograms to women at a distance. It also is important that we identify the characteristics of
\nteachers who are respectful to Aboriginal values and who are successful in creating
\ninterpersonal connectedness through computer-mediated communicative alternatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it