Experiences of female students completing a full-time Aboriginal program by computer-mediated communication
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This naturalistic inquiry examines the experiences of female Aboriginal students who \nwere completing a full-time college program by computer-mediated communication (CMC). \nThe college program was designed for the preparation of Aboriginal Teacher Assistants. The \nbackground literature examines the work of previous scholars on listening to women?s \nvoices, connected learning, appropriate technology for Aboriginal learners and the use of \ncomputer-mediated communication in meeting learners? needs. Eight students volunteered to \nparticipate in the study. Two were lost through attrition. \nData were collected through two sets of face-to-face interviews, one set of \ntelephone interviews, field notes and observation of online messages posted by the \nparticipants. Participant profiles were created from the participants? own words, and the data \nwere analysed for emergent themes. Three themes were identified. These included \ndemographics, prior educational experiences and learning preferences. \nThe analyses of the interrelationships resulted in the identification of barriers to \npositive post secondary educational learning experiences and to the participants? concepts of \nthemselves as learners. The participants? experiences in the Aboriginal Teacher Assistant \nProgram were then examined in relationship to these barriers. \nThe participants? successfully completed this full-time college program and reported \npositive experiences in doing so. Through the analyses of their experiences, factors that led \nto the participants? success were identified. It was determined that for these women to be \nsuccessful, not only must education must be community-based, flexible, and holistic but also \nfoster and nurture relationships between and among students and instructor. These factors \nwere supported by the CMC method o f delivery. \nImplications include providing (1) appropriate technologies, (2) multiple ways of \nconnecting and interacting and (3) face-to-face components when delivering Aboriginal \nprograms to women at a distance. It also is important that we identify the characteristics of \nteachers who are respectful to Aboriginal values and who are successful in creating \ninterpersonal connectedness through computer-mediated communicative alternatives.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle