MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229061849

Macroeconomic Interdependence in the Floating Exchange Rate System

2011· article· en· W2229061849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsInterest rateMonetary economicsStock (firearms)Exchange rateMonetary policyGlobalizationInterest rate parityMoney supplyInternational economicsMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The macroeconomic environments of six countries (U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Canada and Japan) are studied using industrial production, money, short term interest rates, stock returns, and foreign exchange rates. First, the effects of IS and LM shifts on interest rates and stock returns in each country are estimated. The results show that the effects are exactly as predicted by the traditional IS-LM approach. In essence, when investments rise (as the IS curve shifts outward), interest rates will increase as the demand for money rises. Conversely, a similar shift in the LM curve, as money supply increases, will reduce interest rates when investments are held constant. Furthermore, the results show that all six countries are subject to similar shocks, and the responses of the macroeconomic variables are highly correlated. This may be due to the close relationship in international trade, to policy coordination and to the globalization of financial markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Financial Markets Institutions and MoneySame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207