MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229105327 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22425

Gas‐to‐liquids processes: Preface

2016· article· en· W2229105327 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Gregory S. Patience, Daria C. Boffito

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSasol
KeywordsSyngasSyngas to gasoline plusNatural gasGasolineWaste managementCoalEnvironmental scienceGas to liquidsFossil fuelBiomass (ecology)ChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistryCatalysisGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

XtL refers to a collection of technologies that convert natural gas, biomass, coal, and petroleum coke (X) to liquid fuels, waxes, and chemicals (L). GtL (Gas‐to‐Liquids) is a class of XtL that refers specifically to natural gas, which includes producing syngas; removing sulphur compounds, metals, and other contaminants; and reacting the syngas to either Fischer‐Tropsh fuels (FT), gasoline, alcohols, aldehydes, DME, or olefins. Converting natural gas continues to inspire academic research and industry as a means of tackling global warming, adding value to waste streams, and improving the environment. The Web of Science indexed 6400 papers regarding Fischer‐Tropsch in the last 25 years (600 papers in 2014, which is a three‐fold increase versus the late 1990s) and Derwent indexed 3500 patents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207