MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PRIMARY SEX-RATIO VARIATION IN TWO BROOD PARASITIC BIRDS: BROWN-HEADED COWBIRD (MOLOTHRUS ATER) AND COMMON CUCKOO (CUCULUS CANORUS)

2002· article· en· W2229298053 on OpenAlexaff
Michael M. Kasumovic, H. Lisle Gibbs, Bonnie E. Woolfenden, Spencer G. Sealy, Hiroshi Nakamura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Auk · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCowbirdBrood parasiteSex ratioBiologyZoologyCuckooBroodPopulationEcologyParasitismHost (biology)Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined primary sex-ratios of two brood parasitic species, Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) and the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), to determine whether there was any evidence of primary sex-ratio manipulation as has been demonstrated in other species of birds. Despite good reasons for why female brood parasites should manipulate the primary sex-ratio of their young, we found a lack of evidence for a bias in the sex-ratio of eggs produced at the population level, with respect to the host species parasitized or time of breeding season, or in terms of the sex ratio of eggs produced by individual females. Thus, this study provides another example in birds of little evidence for sex-ratio variation in relation to environmental factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AukSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207