MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229347003

Internet in schools: Socio-economic and political factors in Internet use in rural and urban schools in Thailand

2003· article· en· W2229347003 on OpenAlexaff
Alisa Kosolvijak

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetPoliticsEconomic growthPolitical scienceBusinessEconomicsComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explored the influences of social, economic and political factors of Internet use in eight rural and urban schools in southern Thailand. The results of interviews and questionnaires indicated that most respondents in both rural and urban schools perceived IT as a beneficial medium for education and for daily life. However, most teachers lacked understanding and proficiency to use and apply IT in their teaching. Workloads, age and time constraints were highly related to the lack of IT proficiency in teachers and consequently limited IT manpower in schools. Most schools, especially rural ones, faced computer and IT budget constraints, low capacity equipment and inconvenient Internet connections. Most rural schools experienced unstable telephone signals leading to Internet connection difficulties. Finally, it was recommended that similar studies be undertaken in other parts of the country, and that further in-depth study of social factors influencing IT use for education be conducted. Recommendations were also made for applying adult learning approaches in providing IT skill and knowledge to teachers, for using school-based needs assessment for IT provision in schools, and for facilitating collaboration among different parties in promoting IT use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicGlobal Educational Reforms and InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207