Field equations for the massive vector boson from Dirac and Weinberg formalisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is a follow-up to an earlier paper that discussed the single-particle quantum mechanics of massless bose particles. In the present paper we extend the analysis to the massive vector (j = 1) bosons that occur in electroweak interactions. As in the previous paper we make a connection between a generalization of the Dirac equation and the equations obtained by Weinberg from S-matrix field theory. The starting point is the Bargmann–Wigner generalization of the Dirac equation. This leads to the Proca equations for a vector potential field, then to Maxwell’s equations, which we finally relate to Weinberg’s equations. We spend some time analyzing the quantity Tr(Ψ(x)*Ψ(x)), where Ψ(x) is the Bargmann–Wigner wave function (a symmetric four by four matrix). Using Lagrangian and Hamiltonian density equations, we show that the trace has the interpretation of being the Hamiltonian density for the vector potential field. We also use the Lagrangian analysis to construct a conserved current via Noether’s theorem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".