Aspectos históricos e importancia regional del pejerrey bonaerense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Como señalaran Lahille (1929) y Muñoz Goyanas (1988) el origen de la denominación popular del género Atherina deriva del vocablo medieval "pejerrey" constituido por dos palabras peje-reí o pejerey (pez de reyes). Este témino era aplicado en Europa a una especie única de gran valor culinario reiteradamente alabada por los monarcas españoles. De esta manera entre fines del siglo XVlll y principios del XIX los naturalistas viajeros como el jesuita Sánchez Labrador y el ingeniero militar Félíx de Azara, denominaron a nuestras formas como pejerreyes, aún antes de ser descripta, formalmente. El más conocido de nuestros pejerreyes de agua dulce, Odontesthes bonariensis ha sido descripto en 1835 por Cuvíer y Valenciennes con el nombre Atherina bonariensis; especie basada en material capturado por la expedición denominada Voyage del' América Meridionale y cedido por D'Orbignyi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".