MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229897721 · doi:10.5254/1.3570529

MORPHOLOGY AND RHEOLOGY OF NONREACTIVE AND REACTIVE EPDM/PP BLENDS IN TRANSIENT SHEAR FLOW: PLASTICIZED VERSUS NONPLASTICIZED BLENDS

2011· article· en· W2229897721 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRubber Chemistry and Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialRheologyViscoelasticityElastomerCuring (chemistry)PlasticizerShear thinningPolymer blendThermoplastic elastomerShear ratePolypropyleneShearing (physics)ThermoplasticNatural rubberEPDM rubberCopolymerPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Both nonplasticized and plasticized ethylene-propylene-diene-terpolymer/polypropylene (EPDM/PP) based thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) were prepared in the presence and absence of a curing system (i.e., reactive vs nonreactive TPEs). The nonlinear viscoelastic behavior and morphology evolution of these blends were investigated through single and multiple start-up transient experiments to find out the effects of composition, plasticizer, and the presence of the curing system in a homogeneous shear flow field. Due to the highly elastic nature of the elastomeric component, the shear rate was set to 0.1 s −1 and in the case of multiple start-up experiments a 10 min rest time was set between consecutive shearing cycles. The specific interfacial area ( Q ) of the TPEs was analyzed prior and after shearing and subsequently correlated to the corresponding rheological response of these blends. The magnitude and the width of the stress overshoot were correlated to the morphology of the blends, elastomer content, the presence of plasticizer and curing system. The presence of a plasticizer (paraffinic oil) drastically decreased the viscosity and elasticity of both neat polymers and consequently the resulting TPEs; and it further reduced the initial curing rate of the elastomeric component at the early shearing stage of the reactive TPEs. Moreover, the plasticization promoted swelling and coalescence, enlarging the size of the polymeric domains, and decreasing the specific interfacial area. Furthermore, the in situ curing reaction in the reactive TPE blends resulted in less elongated polymeric domains with an irregular and larger interface compared to the nonreactive blends. A phase inverted morphology has also been observed for nonplasticized high elastomer content reactive TPEs sheared for long periods. The obtained experimental morphology data of the nonreactive blends subjected to multiple start-up experiments was fairly well predicted using a phenomenological model proposed by Lee and Park [J. Rheo. 38(5), 1994].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it