MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2230711445 · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2627-z

Substance use patterns and unprotected sex among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting: a prospective cohort study

2015· article· en· W2230711445 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tessa Cheng, Caitlin Johnston, Thomas Kerr, Paul Nguyen, Evan Wood, Kora DeBeck

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreUniversity of British Columbia HospitalAIDS VancouverSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on Drug AbuseProvidence Health CareCanada Research ChairsNational Institutes of HealthMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsMedicineBiostatisticsPublic healthProspective cohort studyEpidemiologyCohort studyEnvironmental healthSubstance useCohortGerontologyDemographyPsychiatryInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy are high among youth. While the intersection between drug and alcohol use and unprotected sex is well recognized, few studies have examined the relationship between substance use patterns and unprotected sex among high risk-populations such as street-involved youth. METHODS: Data were derived from the At-Risk Youth Study (ARYS), a prospective cohort of street-involved youth from Vancouver, Canada. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine substance use patterns that were independently associated with unprotected sex, defined as (vaginal or anal) sexual intercourse without consistent condom use. RESULTS: Between September 2005 and May 2013, 1,026 youth were recruited into the ARYS cohort and 75% (n = 766) reported engaging in recent unprotected sex at some point during the study period. In a multivariable analysis, female gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.81), Caucasian ancestry (AOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.13-1.68), being in a stable relationship (AOR = 4.64, 95% CI: 3.82-5.65), having multiple sex partners (AOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.18-3.10) and the following substance use patterns were all independently associated with recent unprotected sex: injection or non-injection crystal methamphetamine use (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.43), injection or non-injection cocaine use (AOR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.41), marijuana use (AOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49), ecstasy use (AOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48) and alcohol use (AOR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.55) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Unprotected sex was prevalent among street-involved youth in this setting, and independently associated with female gender and a wide range of substance use patterns. Evidence-based and gender-informed sexual health interventions are needed in addition to increased access to youth-centered addiction treatment services. STI testing and linkages to healthcare professionals remain important priorities for street-involved youth, and should be integrated across all health and social services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public HealthSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207