MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2230859200 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-212818

An exceptional outcome from a rare cause of postpartum haemodynamic collapse

2016· article· en· W2230859200 on OpenAlexaff
Megan Delisle, Jenni Metcalfe, Justin Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLaparotomyShock (circulatory)HysterectomyInternal iliac arteryHemoperitoneumSurgeryUterine arteryHemodynamicsAnesthesiaPregnancyRadiologyGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a case of a 26-year-old woman presenting with haemorrhagic shock without any overt bleeding on postpartum day 2. Work up revealed intra-abdominal haemorrhage from an unclear source in the pelvis. She was intubated, resuscitated with mostly crystalloids, and started on norepinephrine and dopamine, in a rural hospital with limited resources. She was then transferred to the closest tertiary care centre 3 h away by air. On arrival, she was hypothermic (34.9°C) and had developed severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.89). A massive transfusion protocol was initiated. She underwent an emergency laparotomy and the origin of the active bleeding was believed to be a branch of the right internal iliac artery. Haemostasis was achieved with packing. She was subsequently taken to interventional radiology for angioembolisation of the right uterine artery as an alternative to haemostatic hysterectomy. Her final diagnosis was rupture of an extrauterine uterine artery pseudoaneurysm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207