MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2231068950 · doi:10.32657/10356/13589

Refining learning models in grammatical inference

2008· dissertation· en· W2231068950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grammatical inference is a branch of computational learning theory that attacks the problem of learning grammatical models from string samples. In other words, grammatical inference tries to identify the computational models that generate the sample strings. In recent decade, due to the explosion of information, efficient ways of searching and organizing are of great importance. Therefore, using grammatical inference methods to process information computationally is very interesting. In real applications, the space-cost plays an important role on performance. In this thesis, we address the problem of refining learning models in grammatical inference. For regular language learning, we introduce formally the notion of “Classification Automaton” that reduces model size by identifying one automaton for multiple string classes.\n\nClassification automaton is proved to reduce 30% model size from a straightforward multiple automata approach on house rent data obtained from the public folder in Microsoft Exchange Server of Nanyang Technological University. In real world applications, there is always a maximum possible length for the strings. Based on this observation, we further introduce cover automata, which simplified a learning model with a maximum length limit, for grammatical inference. Test results based on Splice-junction Gene Sequence database demonstrate the method reduces model size by 32% from the widely used deterministic finite automaton model. By mixed k-th order Markov Chains, stochastic information for all possible substrings within k+1 length is captured. However, the space cost is exponential.\n\nWe introduce the use of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and present a pruning learning method to avoid the exponential space costs. There is a tradeoff between the accuracy and model size. We proposed a balancing method and presented test results based on Splicejunction Gene Sequence database, which demonstrate that the method reduced the model size by 105 times with a reduced accuracy from 80% to 76%. Then, we introduce profile-based alignment learning (PBAL) framework to refine the model for context-free grammar learning. The PBAL framework is an extension of the existing Alignment Based Learning (ABL) framework by making use of statistical information to refine alignment and further refine the learned grammatical rules. The converged results rules are proved in experiments to improve the alignment precision from 50% to 90% with model size reduced to 47%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207