MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2231137889

Association Between Standing and Lying Behavior and Udder Health in Free-stall Housed, Lactating Dairy Cows

2013· dissertation· en· W2231137889 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mary Ellen Alexandrea Watters

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Dairy CommissionDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsUdderMilkingAnimal scienceOddsSomatic cell countMastitisStall (fluid mechanics)LactationBiologyVeterinary medicineLogistic regressionMedicineIce calvingInternal medicineEngineeringPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the relationship between cow lying behavior and udder health in free-stall housed dairy cows milked 3x/d. Two longitudinal studies were undertaken; in the first, associations with risk of elevated somatic cell count (eSCC) were determined and, in the second, associations between management practices, post-milking standing duration (PMSD), and risk of intramammary infection (IMI) were determined. A PMSD of >90 min was associated with reduced odds of eSCC. A PMSD of 90 to 120 min was associated with reduced odds of CNS IMI, as was provision of feed around time of milking. Providing ample feed bunk space, having lower free-stall stocking densities, and providing feed around the time of milking promoted PMSD. Overall, these results suggest that management practices which promote PMSD may help to improve udder health in free-stall cows milked 3x/d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows→French-language works237,207→