MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W22311824 · doi:10.1002/erv.2154

Durum Wheat: Australia's Role in World Markets

2004· article· en· W22311824 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peter Connell, Leanne Lawrance, Rohan Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Commodities: Forecasts and Issues · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCropTonneProduction (economics)AgronomyGeographyAgricultural economicsBiologyAgricultural scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growers of high quality durum wheat in Australia have received prices over A$60 a tonne higher than for Australian premium white wheat in recent years. However, durum is a riskier crop for growers than milling wheat varieties, being more susceptible to drought and requiring lengthier rotations between crops. Australian production of durum wheat averages under 2 per cent of world production, and around 5 per cent of world exports. About half of Australia's durum wheat production is exported, mostly to Italy from ports in New South Wales and South Australia. Australian durum wheat exported to Italy is used to make pasta. Italy is the world's largest exporter of pasta, with Italian exports to the rest of Europe growing strongly in recent years. Prospects for Australia's exports of durum wheat to Italy are positive, with a growing market for Italian pasta and a likelihood that changes to EU support policies will reduce Italian durum wheat production. Commonwealth of Australia 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Commodities: Forecasts and IssuesSame topicAgricultural Economics and PolicyFrench-language works237,207